|
| emil
kazaz and the eternal symbols |
|
commentary
by peter quinones
|
| published
21 february 2008 |
| |
|
special
assignment | volume 1
number 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Every
human is an artist. And this is the main art that we have:
the creation of our story." -Don Miguel Ruiz
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| published
since May 2006 | Special Assignment is a series of artists'
profiles, events spotlights, and interviews. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
Peter
Quinones
(eMail Web
site), a resident of Brooklyn,
New
York, is currently working on a book about contemporary literature
and its relationship to the culture as a whole. Several notable
authors, interviewed by Peter for The Bohemian Aesthetic,
are assisting him with that project.
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
| |
| Born
14 January 1953, in Gyumri, Armenia, Emil
Kazaz was trained as an artist in the traditional academy
style. At age seven, he studied sculpture at the local art school,
then attended the Mercurov Art School when he was 12. After moving
to Yerevan, the capital of Armenia, he continued his studies at
the Terlemezian Art College, which he finished in 1972, and the
University of Fine Arts and Theater, from which he graduated in
1978 with honors. He settled in Los Angeles in 1980. His CV since
then reads like any aspiring artist's dream come true: a steady
stream of exhibitions in Europe, Asia, Russia, North and South America,
Canada, and throughout the United States, along with international
critical recognition, including the prestigious Lorenzo Medici medal
from the Florence Biennale in 2003 and Grande Lorenzo il Magnifico
(Medici) Prize in Sculpture from Florence Biennale 2007. Emil Kazaz
lives and continues to work in Los Angeles, California. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Art can be a confounding
thing, and the general scene loosely lobbed under the broad category
of 'Modern Art' is often enraging and mystifying. A lot of it can seem
like so much hype, noise, and fraud. We think of Duchamp's
toilet bowl, Jeff
Koons' basketballs, Burden's
infamous "Garçon!" cream pitcher, or even Barnett
Newman's large canvases painted a single solid color, and it's very
easy to get the feeling that we're being had. (I suspect this very feeling
is what turns many otherwise interested people off of Modern
Art.) In my opinion, a big drawback is that art of this sort is too
'now', too easily identified with this time, this place, this age. It's,
therefore, refreshing to come across work that can't be pinned
down in such a manner, that's completely indifferent to the present;
work that deals in types or archetypes. The creations of the
Armenian-born, Los Angeles-based painter and sculptor Emil Kazaz seem,
to me, to be just that. Indeed, in studying Kazaz' art (either his paintings
or sculptures) it's impossible to say if it was created in 2007 or 1607;
there are no social, historical, or epochal references of any kind.
Everything is pulled out of the eternal, the atemporalwhat Carl
Jung termed 'the
collective unconscious'.
Joseph L. Henderson, in the "Ancient Myths and Modern Man"
chapter of Jung's anthology, Man
and His Symbols, identifies several kinds of myths which have
repeatedly surfaced in civilizations and cultures throughout time, and,
arguably, the most primal and universal of these is The Myth of the
Hero. It should be kept in mind that this myth is only one of the Eternal
Symbols, and that a lot of Kazaz' work takes up many of the others.
(Further uncovering of this would be a most worthy project for the serious
student.)
The 1995 Kazaz sculpture "Judith" references the familiar
(deuterocanonical) Biblical account of the beautiful Jewish widow Judith
holding the severed head of Holofernes.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
This scene has
been depicted a number of times in Western art; among the most notable
examples are paintings by Allori,
Michelangelo,
Caravaggio,
Klimt
andperhaps the most famous of allArtemisia
Gentileschi. To make a long story quite short, in hero myths, the
hero kills the monster. In the Book of Judith, Holofernes is a general
in the army that has landed Judith and her countrymen in captivity.
She seduces Holofernes (in promise only), gains his confidence, is admitted
to his tent, gets him sloshing drunk, and cuts off his head, causing
the occupying army to flee. It goes without saying that Judith is the
hero, Holofernes the monster. Henderson writes:
|
The
myth of the hero is the most common and the best known myth in
the world.
|
| |
|
We
find it in the classical mythology of Greece and Rome, in the
Middle Ages, in the Far East, and among contemporary primitive
tribes. It also appears in our dreams.
|
| |
|
It
has an obvious dramatic appeal, and a less obviousbut nonetheless
profoundpsychological importance.
|
I don't propose, here, to give any type of detailed critical analysis
of Kazaz' works. Rather, I offer my humble interpretation of their meanings,
and I invite readers to compare well-known portrayals of this Biblical
story by other great artists with Kazaz' sculpture, in order to arrive
at a sense of how different artists achieve different perspective. Here
are some examples:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Judith
with the Head of Holophernes
by Cristofano Allori, 1631
(Royal Collection, London)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judith
Beheading Holofernes
by Caravaggio
|
Judith
Carries Away the Head of Holofernes
by Michelangelo
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Judith
Slaying Holofernes
by Artemisia Gentileschi
|
Judith
I
by Gustav Klimt
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Another
clear hero myth is that of Michael the Archangel. In Jewish and Christian
writings, Michael (or St. Michael, the Archangel) is generally represented
as the Field Commander of the Army of God; he's pictured throughout the
ages of Western civilization as having defeated Satan in battle. Below
are a few examples of that scene, including one by Emil Kazaz, from 1994: |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St.
Michael's Victory Over the Devil
by Sir Jacob Epstein
(near the entrance to
Coventry Cathedral)
|
|
|
|
|
St.
Michael's Victory Over the Devil
(sculpture above the main entrance to St. Michael's
in Hamburg, Germany)
|
|
|
|
|
Fontaine
Saint-Michel
(Paris, France)
|
|
|
|
|
Michael,
the Archangel
(The Sopo Archangels collection)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
archangel
Michael tramples Satan
artist: Guido Reni
(Capuchin Church of Santa Maria della Concezione, Rome)
|
|
|
|
|
Turamichele
(Tower Michele)
(Augsberg, Germany)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| I
think it's quite clear, from these comparisons, that Kazaz' vision, while
similar in some respects, is markedly different in others. (Of course,
this is always true of the greatest art: it's simultaneously familiar
and unfamiliar ). I leave it to more accomplished and discerning
critics to comment directly on the works, confident that few would miss
the almost unbelieveable force and power of Emil Kazaz' sculpture and
the supreme execution of his vision. I believe that his engagement with
the Eternal Symbols is one of the most fascinating things happening in
art today. |
| |
|
|
| |
| INTERVIEW |
| |
|
PETER
QUINONES: |
You recently
had great success with your sculptures at the Biennale Internazionale
Dell'Arte Contemporanea in Florence, Italy. Can you tell us
what that was like?
|
| |
|
|
EMIL
KAZAZ:
|
It
does feel like victory.
|
| |
|
| PQ: |
Please
tell us a bit about the works you exhibited at the Biennale.
|
| |
|
|
EK:
|
My
work is visual art you must see and feel. Telling about the
art is not the same as seeing it. Words do not allow [you to]
visualize the image of art. Moreover, even the photos of the
artworks do not do justice to the actual artworks.
|
| |
|
|
PQ:
|
Who
are some of your favorite artists or the greatest influences
on your art? I ask because you don't seem to follow any school
or movement in particular; your work is very unique.
|
| |
|
|
EK:
|
Donatello,
Titian, Velasques, El Greko, Michelangelo, and Bosch were my
teachers. Influence would not be the right word to use, but
[I] love to create while listening [to] Mozart or Bach.
|
| |
|
|
PQ:
|
What
are the central themes or messages of your art?
|
| |
|
|
EK:
|
I
am born for Art and I live for Art. What message? When the bee
makes the honey, does it think about message? When the hen lays
eggs, does it think about message? And when the pregnant woman
bears a child, does she think about the message? Likewise, when
I sculpt, paint or draw, I never think about any message. The
message is what you see and understand.
|
| |
|
|
PQ:
|
How
does being a serious artist in the U.S. differ from the scene
in Armenia or Europe?
|
| |
|
| EK: |
Since it
is extremely difficult to become a very serious artist in [the]
U.S.A., it makes the serious artist stronger on the way of their
hard endeavors than to become serious in a rather easy way.
It is the same like in sports when the sportsman trains himself
with heavy duty or with no coach to train him right.
Let's explore an example: Jasper Jones in [the] United States,
Picasso in Europe, and Martiros Saryan in Armenia. They do have
a lot similar and at the same time different. They are similar
in making their dream come true; they have made their dreams.
Although they are different with their point of view and valuing
the life by their own values. It all depends on the philosophy
of the artist wherever they come from.
|
| |
|
|
PQ:
|
You
also paint. What are some of the similarities and differences
between painting and sculpture, for you? Let's say you have
an idea, what determines if you paint it or sculpt?
|
| |
|
| EK: |
The sculpture
is three dimensional; when you want to feel and touch your ideas,
then you sculpt. All my ideas are explored in both painting
and sculpting, though they are two different medias [sic] and
techniques to work with. Painting and sculpting both have their
unique structure and their own advantages. It is like talking
in different languages. Whenever you talk in different languages,
you feel great about using them both.
Sculpture is an art of form with three dimensions and paining
is art of colors. You can never be bored while talking two languages
at the same time.
|
| |
|
|
PQ:
|
Could
we get your thoughts on one specific painting, say "Pios"
of 1997? |
| |
|
|
EK:
|
Sure..."Love
makes the dead alive, but the forbidden love is always sweeter."
Pop is the spiritual and sacred world and the figure of the
woman is the earthy world. The image of sacred and earthy humankind
is the magnetization of the two different worlds.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Emil Kazaz was
awarded the prestigious Grande Lorenzo il Magnifico (Medici) Prize in
Sculpture at the 2007 Florence Biennale.
|
|
|
|
|
Kazaz
with Grande Lorenzo il Magnifico (Medici) Prize and his sculpture,
"The Cup of Moon"
|
Dr.
Monet Airian of Airian Dome of Fine Art;
Piero Celona, Vice President of the
Florence Biennale 2207; and Kazaz
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Airian
and Kazaz, with Grande Lorenzo il Magnifico (Medici) Prize,
next to "King's Toy" bronze sculpture
|
Eugenio
Giani and Kazaz
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Views expressed
on this page may or may not be representative of The Bohemian
Aesthetic or its founder. All materials appearing on this Web
site are copyrights of patsymooreDOTcom, respective authors,
or original sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|