So,
I'm poring through the 25th anniversary issue of Ms.
(on some airplane going somewhere in the amorphous blur that
amounts to my life) and I'm finding it endlessly enlightening
and stimulating as always, when, whaddaya know, I come across
a little picture of little me. I was flattered to be included
in that issue's "21 Feminists for the 21st Century" thingybob.
I think ya'll are runnin the most bold and babe-olishious magazine
around, after all.
'Problem is, I couldn't help but be a little weirded out by the paragraph next to my head that summed up her me-ness and my relationship to the feminist continuum. What got me was that it largely detailed my financial successes and sales statistics. My achievements were represented by the fact that I "make more money per album sold than Hootie and the Blowfish," and that my catalogue sales exceed 3/4 of a million. It was specified that I don't just have my own record company but my own "profitable" record company. Still, the ironic conclusion of the aforementioned blurb is a quote from me insisting "it's not about the money." Why then, I ask myself, must "the money" be the focus of so much of the media that surrounds me? Why can't I escape it, even in the hallowed pages of Ms.?
Firstly, this Hootie and the Blowfish business was not my doing.
The LA Times financial section wrote an article about
my record label, Righteous Babe Records, in which they raved
about the business savvy of a singer (me) who thwarted the corporate
overhead by choosing to remain independent, thereby pocketing
$4.25 per unit, as opposed to the $1.25 made by Hootie
or the $2.00 made by Michael Jackson. This story was then picked
up and reprinted by The New York Times, Forbes
magazine, the Financial News Network, and (lo and behold)
Ms..
So, here I am, publicly morphing into some kinda Fortune
500-young-entrepreneur-from-hell, and all along I thought I
was just a folksinger!
OK, it's true. I do make a much larger profit (percentage-wise)
than the Hootster. What's even more astounding is that there
are thousands of musicians out there who make an even higher
profit percentage than me! How many local, musicians are there
in your community who play gigs in bars and coffee shops about
town? I bet lots of them have made cassettes or CDS which they'll
happily sell to you with a personal smile from the edge of the
stage or back at the bar after their set. Would you believe
these shrewd, profit-minded wheeler-dealers are pocketing a
whopping 100% of the profits on the sales of those puppies?!
Wait till the Financial News Network gets a whiff of them!
I sell approximately 2.5% of the albums that a Joan Jewelanis
Morrisette sells and get about .05% of the airplay royalties,
so obviously if it all comes down to dollars and cents, I've
led a wholly unremarkable life. Yet I choose relative statistical
mediocrity over fame and fortune because I have a bigger purpose
in mind. Imagine how strange it must be for a girl who has spent
10 years fighting as hard as she could against the lure of the
corporate carrot and the almighty forces of capital, only to
be eventually recognized by the power structure as a business
pioneer.
But this is, of course, the 21st century, the era of global capitalism, along whose circuits musicJazz, and many other musicsnow travel. So that this obsolete notion of laissez faire capitalismthis notion still informs our ideas about both capitalism and democracy. And it is an obsolete notion.
I have, indeed, sold enough records to open a small office on
the half-abandoned main street in the dilapidated urban center
of my hometown, Buffalo, New York. I am able to hire 15 or so
folks to run and constantly reinvent the place while I drive
around and play music for people. I am able to give stimulating
business to local printers and manufacturers and to employ the
services of independent distributors, promoters, booking agents
and publicists. I was able to quit my day job and devote myself
to what I love.
And, yes, we are enjoying modest profits these days, affording
us the opportunity to reinvest in innumerable political and
artistic endeavors. RBR is no Warner Bros.. But it is a going
concern and, for me, it is a vehicle for redefining the relationship
between art and commerce in my own life. It is a record company
which is the product not just of my own imagination, but that
of my friend and manager Scot Fisher and of all the people who
work there. People who incorporate and coordinate politics,
art and media every day into a people-friendly, sub-corporate,
woman-informed, queer-happy small business that puts music before
rock stardom and ideology before profit.
And me. I'm just a folksinger, not an entrepreneur. My hope
is that my music and poetry will be enjoyable and/or meaningful
to someone, somewhere, not that I maximize my profit margins.
It was 15 years and 11 albums getting to this place of notoriety
and, if anything, I think I was happier way back when. Not that
I regret any of my decisions, mind you. I'm glad I didn't sign
on to the corporate army. I mourn the commodification and homogenization
of music by the music industry, and I fear the manufacture of
consent by the corporately-controlled media. Last thing I want
to do is feed the machine.
I was recently mortified while waiting in the dressing room
before one of my own shows. Some putz suddenly takes the stage
to announce me and exclaim excitedly that this was my "largest
sold-out crowd to date!" "Oh, really?," I'm thinking to myself,
"that's interesting...too bad it's not the point." All of my
achievements are artistic, as are all of my failures.
That's just the way I see it. Statistical plateau or no. I'll bust ass if 60 people, or 6000, watch me.
I have so much respect for Ms. magazine. If I couldn't
pick it up at newsstands, my brain probably would've atrophied
by now on some trans-Atlantic flight and I would be lying limp
and twitchy in a bed of constant travel, staring blankly into
the abyss of the gossip magazines. Ms. is a structure
of media wherein women are able to define themselves and articulate,
for themselves, those definitions. We wouldn't point to 21 of
the feminists moving into the 21st century and define them in
terms of "Here's Becky Ballbuster from Iowa City, she's got
a great ass and a cute little button nose..." No ma'am. We've
gone beyond the limited perceptions of sexism so we should move
beyond the language and perspective of the corporate patriarchy.
The Financial News Network may be ultimately impressed with
me now that I've proven to them that there's a life beyond the
auspices of papa Sony, but do I really have to prove this to
you?
We have the ability and the opportunity to recognize women not
just for the financial successes of their work but for the work
itself. We have the facility to judge each other by entirely
different criteria than those imposed upon us by the superstructure
of society. We have a view which reaches beyond profit margins
into poetry, and a vocabulary to articulate the difference.
Thanks for including me, Ms., really. But just promise
me one thingif I drop dead tomorrow, tell me my grave
stone won't read:
|
ani d.
|
|
CEO.
|
| Please let it read: |
| songwriter |
| musicmaker |
| storyteller |
| freak. |
| Ani DiFranco |


