|
| jean
stafford's
the catheriine wheel (1952) |
|
commentary
by peter quinones
|
| published
15 february 2006 |
| |
|
the
art of fiction | volume 1
number 6
|
print
 |
|
|
|
|
|
"A
good book is the precious life-blood of a master spirit,
embalmed and treasured up on purpose to a life beyond
life. -John
Milton
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| published
since November 2005 | The Art of Fictionconsideration
of great novels |
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
Peter
Quinones
(eMail Web
site), a resident of Brooklyn,
New
York, is currently working on a book about contemporary literature
and its relationship to the culture as a whole. Several notable
authors, interviewed by Peter for The Bohemian Aesthetic,
are assisting him with that project.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Publisher:
Avon
(1966)
|
|
Language:
English
|
|
ASIN:
B000J63ZKW
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Sometimes, in chess,
a situation arises known as zuzgwang. This means that you have
no good moves available to you; anything you do merely serves to benefit
your opponent and make your own position worse. In my research on Jean
Stafford's third and last novel, I was more than a little surprised
to discover that many commentators were of the opinion that Stafford
had written herself into a kind of literary zuzgwang. The impeccably
crafted texture of the story, so it seemedits beautiful composition
and slow, pent up variations on the motif of tension and releasewas
so perfectly done that any finish the author might come up with would
seem artificial and contrived. As one of Stafford's several biographers,
David Roberts, wrote: "No possible denouement can live up to the
richness that the plot promises." I'm not so sure. I think I can
find five stories a week in the New York papers that seem equally bizarre
and surreal, yet they will be actual, real world happenings and not
the superficially constructed ending of fiction. However, even if we
were to grant that the criticism is accurate, the novel has so
many other outstanding features and benefits to offer a reader that
it almost wouldn't matter.
Every summer, young Andrew Shipley and his twin sisters, Honor and Harriet,
come to Congreve House in Hawthorne, a quaint New England town, to be
with their elegantly beautiful cousin Katherine, while their parents
(John and Maeve Shipley) vacation mightily in Europe. Andrew always
looks forward to these summers because he spends the lion's share of
his time with his very best friend in the world, Victor Smithwick. The
two get involved in all manner of mischievous summer adventures; for
Andrew, this is the active creation of the memories of a lifetime. This
particular year, though, there is a disruption. Victor's older brother
Charles, a sailor, has come home to recover from a grave illness and
occupies the great majority of his brother's time, leaving Victor no
time at all to hang out with Andrew. For a young boy of Andrew's age,
this is nothing less than a catastrophe. He is simply not psychologically
equipped for it. The prospect of going through the eternity of the summer
months without Victor's guidance and companionship is terrifyingso
terrifying, in fact, that he begins to secretly wish for Charles Smithwick's
death. ("Charles Smithwick die, oh Charles, get well, oh, big fat
nitwit, Charley Smithy, go to hell for leather."; "He began
to have dreams of Charles Smithwick from which he awoke in a guilty
sweat..."; "But the small star would have to do, for he could
see no other, and he wished that Charles would die.") The accuracy
with which Stafford portrays how this relatively inconsequential series
of events becomes an all-consuming passion in the mind of a small boy
is absolutely phenomenal, a truly remarkable achievement. As the story
progresses, the voices in Andrew's head escalate from a whisper to a
roar. The way Stafford uses this device to communicate his anxiety,
loneliness, and frightened sensibility is, again, extraordinary. It
is fascinating to watch how other characters in the story are baffled
by his often inexplicable outward behavior while we, the readers, know
and understand his motivation for behaving as he does. For Andrew never
reveals his secret or talks about the cause of his depression, although,
as events progress, he begins to fear that Katherine is somehow able
to read his thoughts and, thus, can see the malice in his heart.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
In the meantime,
we learn that Katherine has a deep, dark, hidden secret of her own:
she's having an affair with John, Andrew's father. John has promised
to decide, by summer's end, whether to leave Maeve for Katherine or
stay with her, for the sake of the children. Stafford manipulates the
plot so that Katherine has plausible reason to believe that Andrew may
have gained knowledge of the forbidden love and, thereby, we come to
the fantastic situation: the two cousins, each with a terrible secret,
exist and suffer with the mortal apprehension that each knows what the
other is concealing. (In reality, neither one knows anything and neither
ever will.) The chapters go back and forth between the two points of
view. The relationship between the cousins resembles that of parent
and child, at some points (he's twelve, she's in her forties), and that
of pals, at other points.
The story hums along as both almost begin to crack under the strain
of psychological torment. Andrew can hardly stand the command that Charles
die constantly ringing in his head like the bell in the tower of a basilica
and, as the tragedy slowly grinds to its inexorable end, Katherine slips
further and further into the grip of worry:
| She
knew that it was only a question of time before the signature
of her distress would be written on her face. The sleeplessness
would show, straining the eye sockets, loosening the flesh from
the cheekbones, and the headaches would assert themselves in
lines and the dragging weakness in her arms, as if all the strata
of her flesh were starving except the live, thrashing nerves. |
The inner state creates the matching outward appearance; what's
inside will eventually also be outside; as in the microcosm, so
in the macrocosm. The unified personbody and soulis
like a hologram.
In the closing pages, two details of which the reader has been aware,
for most of the story, converge in a way that is quite surprising.
Katherine has ordered a tombstone for herself, first; and she has
an affinity withand affection forCatherine Wheels, the
spinning racks of sparks often used at Fourth of July celebrations,
second. When the tombstone comes, it depicts Katherine with a Catherine
Wheel above her head. And here, finally, comes the information we
need to know. The saint, Catherine of Alexandria, was a martyr of
the Church, crucified by having her body tied on to a spinning rack
of fire. Thus, the name of the wheel. Now, you might say that it's
really heavy-handed and obvious for Stafford to have her heroine
so blatantly identify herself with a martyr, in this fashion, but
keep in mind that Katherine has kept absolutely silent about her
secret; only she and John know. Her suffering has not been publicized.
Her "martyrdom" is entirely internal.
And, so, we come to the devastating conclusion, which I prefer not
to give away here. What are we to make of it all? I think, in many
ways, Stafford was trying to work out the complexities of her own
life in her fiction. In David Laskin's book Partisans: Marriage,
Politics and Betrayal Among the New York Intellectuals, an early
lover of Stafford's, Robert Hightower, is quoted as saying "She
was always trouble. Wherever she was, things happened." Her
disastrous marriage to the poet Robert Lowell was something Stafford
never really got over. Consider the descriptive passage above, about
Katherine's face, in light of the fact that Lowell once crashed
his car into a wall, perhaps trying to kill himself and Stafford
(she was in the passenger's seat) and that Stafford's face was permanently
disfigured in the accident, and you see what I mean, right away.
Biographies of Stafford have subtitles like The Savage Heart
and The Interior Castle; there's even a literary study entitled
"Disfigurement In The Fiction of Jean Stafford". Her novels,
as well as her exquisite, powerful short stories, may be said to
be dreary and morose in theme and subject mattercertainly,
The Catherine Wheel evidences a deep pessimismbut,
like the question of the plausibility of the climax, I don't particularly
see that as a detriment to enjoyment. Much literature from around
the midpoint of the last century is like this, with the height of
the shadow of the Cold War lurking in the background in addition
to all the writer's own private demons.
A major cause of enjoyment is this: Stafford is a complete and total
master of the English language and of the art of prose fiction.
Some of her sentences glisten in the mind like finely individuated
snowflakes, single icicles dangling in winter sunlight off a windowsill,
like the two or three last glowing embers of an extinguished bonfire:
|
The
sound made him lonely the way the sound of a night train could
do, or the look of a dog staring through a window.
|
| |
|
John
was in his forties, grappling with his twenties.
|
| |
|
"The
young are not as young as we used to be."
|
| |
|
He
waited, in the larger chambers of his being, for the world
to right itself...
|
| |
|
As
she stared at the small, heavy-headed boy, the wheel began,
in the dark vault of her heart, slowly to revolve.
|
Anyone who has so much as even thought about writing a story wishes
he/she could write sentences such as these and, for this sort of
instruction alone, the book is well worth reading.
In summation, I think The Catherine Wheel is a most worthy
project for anyone who is seriously interested in American fiction
of the last century. It is thought provoking, psychologically penetrating,
exacting in its observation of characters both major and minor,
beautifully written, evidences a highly developed aesthetic sense,
and is tuned in to certain definite channels of emotional experience.
As I read, I often found myself putting the book down for a moment,
shutting my eyes, and trying to recreate the scenes and the feelings
on the page in my own mind and body. Fiction that activates curiosity
of this order is always fiction of a most worthwhile kind.
|
| |
|
|
Views expressed
on this page may or may not be representative of The Bohemian
Aesthetic or its founder. All materials appearing on this Web
site are copyrights of patsymooreDOTcom, respective authors,
or original sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|