|
Meanwhile, back
home, Corde has left behind a social inferno largely of his own making.
A white student has been killed on campus, and two blacks are going
to trial for the murder. Corde's nephew, Mason, is instrumental in inciting
hostilityboth on campus and in the black communitycharging
that the college, and thus Corde, are racist. Immediately following
the killing, there are no witnesses, but when Corde puts up reward money,
several suddenly appear out of the woodwork"Witnesses bought
and paid for," Mason sneers. And Corde's cousin, Max, is the defense
attorney for the accused. As if all this weren't enough, Corde has just
published two long, blistering articles about Chicago, in Harper's,
that have managed to offend just about every group in the city.
The ensorcelling phylum of characters inhabiting these pages not only
advances the plot and polishes the texture; it also serves to represent
the great panorama of humanity, the universal stage; and, finally, it
functions as a means to invite the reader to philosophize for herself
and to consider the philosophies being offered. Some of these characters
float in and out for only a few pages, others much more; but all contribute.
The American Ambassador to Rumania unexpectedly sends a car for Corde,
a giant Lincoln Continental with an American flag on the door, something
which, in Bucharest, might as well be a spaceship from Close Encounters
of the Third Kind. He, the Ambassador, may well be the only black
person in the entire country. Over drinks, he tells Corde that he used
to regularly read his pieces in the International Herald Tribune.
The Ambassador gets nowhere, however, with the terrifying KGB Colonel
who runs the hospital, when Corde asks that his wife be granted more
visiting time with her dying mother.
The most tenderly explored relationship in the book is the one between
Corde and his dying mother-in-law. During the endless hours he must
spend waiting in her apartment, with absolutely nothing to do, he finds
copies of Harper's with his articles. She's studied them to death,
underlining and writing notes in the margins. Why? In the hospital,
Corde tells her, "I love you." Barely conscious, she suddenly
begins to writhe and thrash on the bed. The machines and monitors she's
hooked up to go beserk; doctors rush in to whisk him away.
In Chicago, the African American head of County Jail, Rufus Ridpath,
has gone on trial, accused of cruelty to prisoners. He was featured
prominently in the dean's articles. When Corde interviews his defense
lawyer for the articles, he all but tells him that Ridpath was set up
by political bigwigs downtown due to his zealousness in running the
jail. Mason, the nephew, harbors nothing but contempt for his uncle:
"For those people, the stakes were life and death. What did Uncle
Albert stake? Let him stick to his fancy higher educationseminars
in Plato and the Good. Those people of the underclassdopers or
muggers or whoreswhat were they? Mice?"
Regarding urban blight: a geochemist named Beech has some major theories,
and when, by chance, he reads Corde's pieces, he approaches the author
about the possibility of collaborating on an articlea Major Statement,
a Thesis of Grand Proportions, hard science with an eye towards social
good. Witness:
|
He
said to Corde: "You, the author of those special articles,
mightyou just mightbe able to blow the whistle. I
want to stop everybody in their tracks and force them to follow.
And you can be gripping. As with the blacks you described in public
housing and in the jails..."
|
| |
|
"I
didn't please everybody."
|
| |
| "I
would assume not. That's exactly it. And when I read your description
of the inner city, I said, 'Here's a man who will want the real
explanation of what goes on in those slums.'" |
| |
| "And
the explanation? What is the real explanation?" |
| |
| "Millions
of tons of intractable lead residues poisoning the children of the
poor...Crime and social disorganization in inner city populations
can all be traced to the effects of lead. It comes down to the nerves,
to brain damage." |
Corde wrestles with Beech's strictly materialist view of the world
for a good deal of the novel; in the end, his decision to write or not
write the paper with Beech hinges on a few unforseen circumstances.
Some involve a man named Dewey Spangler, a person of elephantine influence
in the shaping of public opinion. Spangler is a journalist who interviews
the Nixons, the Kissingers, the Brezhnevs of the world, and he and Corde
were friends as boys in Chicago. They meet twice in the dining room
of the Intercontinental Hotel in Bucharestjust by chance, they
are in town at the same timeand Spangler, by novel's end, will
try to put to rest some old demons that have dwelled between the two
for forty years. The relationship of the two men is very complicated,
very mawkish, involving the contumacious traits of each. Spangler forces
Corde's hand very deliberately, in the end, and it isn't really clear
if this is out of malice and revenge or out of love and caring (a case,
it seems to me, may be made for either).
Obviously, Chicago is a familiar Bellovian setting, and we're not surprised
to find Bellow at the top of his game in the scenes he places there.
The look, feel and mood of the bleak physical and psychological landscapes
of Communist Rumania, however, may be new territory for both novelist
and reader, and, therefore, present a challenge. The social conditions
of the moment are captured in this passage "In the dining room,
there was a huge short wave radio which looked as if it could reach
Java but gave only jamming squeals. The big TV with its wooden cowl
was equally useless. On it, you saw nobody but the dictator. He inspected,
reviewed, greeted, presided; and there were fanfares, flowers, and limousines.
People were shown applauding. But if emigration were permitted, the
country would be empty within a month." The toilets don't flush,
you have to pour water from a bucket. A tangerine or a bunch of grapes
are black market delicacies. "December brown" comes at three
in the afternoon.
Three Rumanian women stand at the psychological center of the novel:
Corde's wife Minna, her dying mother Valeria, and Valeria's sister Gigi.
Thirty years prior, Valeria had been the country's Minister of Health
(had in fact founded the very hospital in which she now lies dying)
but was expelled in disgrace, thrown out of the party. Gigi's gone to
pieces, having depended on her sister for guidance in everything in
this world. Minna, who depends on Corde for "sublunary matters",
is not worldly at all, is wholly consumed with her scientific endeavors;
unlike her husband, she cares not a wit for social issues like crime,
slums, and prisons. She is at a complete loss to navigate the human
complexities of the Communist red tape that controls the fate of her
mother (and one of the striking points that Bellow gets across here
is that Corde, who is networked to his eyeballs, doesn't get anything
substantive done in this regard either, though, in Chicago, his contacts
and connections produce quite different results).
In the final sequences, after all accounts in both Chicago and Bucharest
are settled, Minna has a breakdown once they return to the States. The
stress of it all has simply been too much. Yet, she has an appointment
for research time at the great telescope in Mount Palomar, Californiasomething,
apparently, very hard to get. If she misses this chance, another won't
come for a long time. In spite of her husband's objections, she decides
to go. This is where the novel ends, in the starsas Minna descends
into the control room of the telescope, hooked up with all kinds of
scientific gauges and machinery and Corde contemplates the heavensso
clear, so vivid, so real at the top of the telescope, at the top of
the mountains, and feels a deep sense of community with the universe,
something he can't explain but feels. The implication is that
the pure scientist, the astronomer, may be able to achieve an avenue
of knowledge that is beyond that which can be achieved by the journalist,
the dean.
In The Dean's December, we see one man grapple with race relations;
with the Cold War ideologies that competed so tensely; with purported
scientific explanations of human behavior; with complex issues of family
and friendship; with the decay of the American city and the establishment
of a permanent underclass; with the incredibly frustrated lives of people
who once lived in freedom but came under the rule of the Communists;
with the diplomatic protocol and dealings which exist at the highest
levels of government; with questions of love and marriage; with the
ties that bind people together across decades, across oceans, across
entire lives; and with the beauty of the purely intellectual pursuits
of science. This is a magnificent novel with rich, true-to-life characters,
a plot that is not too complex yet not too simple, with vividly described
places and events, and with a willingness to take up big philosophical
issues. It repays the reader's investment in it, over and over again.
|