heidi pitlor's the birthdays  (2006)
commentary by peter quinones
published 30 july 2006
 
the art of fiction | volume 1 number 17
print
 
"A good book is the precious life-blood of a master spirit, embalmed and treasured up on purpose to a life beyond life. -John Milton
 
published since November 2005 | The Art of Fiction—consideration of great novels
 
 
Peter Quinones (eMailWeb site), a resident of Brooklyn, New York, is currently working on a book about contemporary literature and its relationship to the culture as a whole. Several notable authors, interviewed by Peter for The Bohemian Aesthetic, are assisting him with that project.
 
 
 
Publisher: W. W. Norton; Reprint edition
(4 June 2007)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0393329933
ISBN-13: 978-0393329933
 
 
 

 
 
Advanced Notions (various)
formerly patsymooreDOTcoms Bonus Writings; insightful and inciting literature from artists and about art
 
Amsterdam Dispatch (Karin Bos)
an insider's look at the art scene and artist life in Amsterdam
 
The Art of Fiction (Peter Quinones)
reviews of timeless literature
author interviews
 
bohoTV (various)
noteworthy Arts-centric viral video
 
Cambridge Letters (Kym Cooper-Rodgers)
reports about art scenes abroad
(9/2004-12/2005)
 
Deleted Scenes (Stuart Chait)
a guide to the great cinema and television you're missing
 
Design Psychology (Jeanette Joy Fisher)
a look at how design elements contribute to happiness, well-being, and productivity
(7/2005-3/2007)
 
The Iraq Watch Papers (various)
observations on war and peace
(3/2003-7/2006)
 
Lessons in Creativity (Linda Dessau)
self-care tips for artists
 
London Letters (Shakila Taranum Maan)
reports about the London arts scene and design
 
On Books (Tim Haigh)
book criticism
 
Paris: Vie et Art (Francis Powell)
an insider's look at the art scene and artist life in The City of Light
 
Portrait of the Artist (various)
a gallery of work by compelling visualists
 
Rake on Music (Jamie Lee Rake)
your map to the music underground
 
Savor (Brian Parker)
a passionate survey of food and cooking
 
The Self Expressed (various)
creative writing
 
Special Assignment (various)
profiles and interviews
 
Tending the Planet (Alyssa Stebbing)
ruminations on social responsibility and spiritual life
 
Thus Spake Fred (Fred Clark)
smart, witty examinations of socio-political issues
 
transcripts from A Lovers Quarrel
(Dwight Ozard)
one man's documentation of his restless relationship with faith and culture
(6/2004-9/2005)
 
Verse (Jim Newcombe/John-Paul Gillespie)
poetry laid bare
 
Verse Live (various)
new poetry
 
The World Watch Papers (various)
inspections of matters impacting the globe
 
Write of Passage (Eboni Rafus)
journalings of a confirmed writer

 

A woman sits in the passenger seat of the family car; her husband, outside, presses his lips against the glass of the window and mimes a kiss. Once he gets in, he tries to give her a real kiss, but she protests that his lips have gotten dirty from the window, and she pushes him away. Of course, the glass symbolizes and emphasizes the psychological distance between them, the fact that there's a short in their emotional circuit. A second, different woman gives her house a last quick check before she and her husband go away for the weekend. He's in the car waiting for her; as she pulls the front door of the house closed, and looks up, she catches her husband staring right at her. Neither one was expecting the deep eye contact, and it unnerves them both. A third woman helps her disabled husband into their car. In the past, he's trained to do this himself; but now, for some reason, he likes to depend on her help. The issue of whether he's milking his disability, feeling a bit too sorry for himself, hangs in the air around them like cigarette smoke.


These are some of the scenes from the first chapter of Heidi Pitlor's novel The Birthdays, and these three couples make up six of the book's seven major characters. In order to get a firm idea of the level of complexity to which The Birthdays eventually ascends, let's consider that it offers a meticulous examination of these seven people over the course of a weekend together and that we, as readers, must observe the dynamics of each character impacting upon the others, adding up to a total of forty-two relationships. (We let the overlaps count twice; for example: Ellen to Joe and Joe to Ellen. Even though they're the same two people, the agnation is seen quite differently by each). In addition, several secondary characters also exert influence over the unfolding events (some present the story within the real time of the fiction, some not), further complicating the circumstances. The effect is not unlike that of billiard balls colliding: one ball may hit eight others and affect each of the eight in a different way.

 
 
Pitlor
 
 

The couples above are, respectively, Jake Miller and his wife Liz; his parents, Ellen and Joe Miller; and his brother Daniel and his wife, Brenda. The seventh member of the clan is his sister—the single, directionless Hilary—who has no significant other. They've come together at Jake and Liz's summer place on Maine's Great Salt Island to celebrate Joe's seventy-fifth birthday as well as Liz' and Brenda's pregnancies. Hilary's with child too, though unsure of who the father is. Liz' pregnancy is non-traditional; she and Jake have failed for years, finally opting for fertilization. Brenda's become pregnant via an anonymous sperm donor because Daniel's accident left him not only confined to a wheelchair without the use of his legs, but unable to sire a child. It's the first time in four years that the seven have gotten together; the last time was for a funeral. This is one of the oldest, most enduring of anthropological witnessings, the ritualistic acknowledgment of birth and death, and it fits in well with the overall ambition of the novel. Pitlor is reaching for atemporal truths, here, verities that aren't dependent upon any specific social conditions or the contemporary social climate. (Notice that, in a 350-plus page tale about middle to upper class New Englanders in the year 2000, the Internet is barely mentioned at all). The following describes the typical Miller family get together:


No matter how infrequently the seven gathered, they talked about the same things—their jobs, politics, their travel plans—in the same lulling rhythm as if they had never parted.


But this weekend will be different; feelings and thoughts that have been dormant for years—in some cases, for thirty, forty years—like the lava in a long-quiet volcano, will erupt uncontrollably. The amazing miracle of pregnancy—augmented by, amplified by, the techniques of modern medical technology—is the main theme, with family relations a close second, but Pitlor touches on numerous sub-themes which immeasureably flavor this opulent chronicle.


I'm going to concentrate on the first chapter because it's a model of how to lay down a framework for a long story, and it illustrates, to perfection, how to establish the roots of character—how to give clues as to what is to come further on—and lays down the foundations for the tragedy that occurs roughly in the middle of the book and the rays of hope (in some cases, the rays of disillusionment) which follow. You might say this is a bit narrow in focus and scope; but, in a brief column, I think it's a fair approach. And I think that when we see how much mileage there is to be gotten out of a single chapter, our appetite for the whole work is seriously whetted. To go into the book in great depth, as I stated above, one would have to take each of the seven characters and look at their relationship to the other six, like so:

DANIEL's relationship
to Brenda
 
to Hilary
 
to Jake
 
to Liz
 
to Joe
 
to Ellen


Etc., etc., and then we'd make a similar chart for each of the other six characters.


The first chapter, "Genetics", follows a definite schematic in its first three episodes, which sequentially introduce us to the three couples. The fourth, about Hilary, is different—and I'll therefore discuss it last, on its own.


The first three contain key elements which define the couples for us, and I'll just get into three now: (1)proxemics, (2) the introduction of an outside intruder injecting stress into the relationship and (3) tension due to a lack of sex and romance. Readers should keep in mind, however, that there are numerous others; differences in jobs and economic status, and the feelings attached to these, make up a great part of this novel. So does the way we begin to see cracks in the apparent solidity of all the relationships. At one point, Pitlor makes the momentous observation that while, of course all, parents love their children, that doesn't necessarily mean that they like them. I felt my ventricles flutter when I read that.


Proxemics | In the field of proxemics, it's customarily taught that most people feel totally at ease in three places—their homes, their cars, and their jobs. In this case, observing the principals at work would be implausible and irrelevant, but Pitlor has us observe them in their kitchens first and, then, in their cars. And, in presenting each, she employs the use of colors to establish both atmosphere and mood:


Daniel no longer liked the color he and his wife had painted their dining room walls. Faded, marble ocher, it was an almost physiological shade. More the color of indigestion than peaceful meals and a happy home—what had they been thinking? He didn't like the walls and he didn't like the pea green place mats Brenda had just bought, or the matching cloth napkins with the pea green flecks.
 
Ellen Miller stood at the stove, waiting for the kettle to whistle. She imagined her fingers losing sensation, then her arms, her shoulders, her neck. She pictured each part of herself shutting down, then the memories, the knowledge, the sound of her own breath each night, the look of the melon-colored sun setting over the abandoned playground at the end of the street, all of it fading to black.
 
Jake Miller followed his wife into their kitchen, where she'd arranged the food for the weekend by meals. Next to a carton of eggs on the counter sat a brick of cheddar, a red onion, a bag of mushrooms, a package of sausages. The canister of coffee sat beside the bag of sugar; the baguette beside the raspberry jam; the cantaloupe beside the blueberries.


This is intensely interesting because the three scenes are, more or less, occurring simultaneously, at the same general moment, within the context of the fiction, as are the scenes when the couples take to their automobiles (being in the car with the beloved serves as a symbol of their lives' journeys; Hilary's only involvement with a car, on her way to the reunion, is with a silly old female taxi driver who tells dirty jokes, though, once there, she too has a more meaningful car ride, as we shall see). In the first paragraph above we catch a glimpse of the couples in their cars, where both Brenda and Liz fiddle with the radio dials as if this could adjust the problems in their marriages, which we'll look at first in the form of


The Outside Intruder Injecting Stress into the Relationship | Daniel is obsessed with the anonymous sperm donor; ultimately, this is due to rage at his own impotence and inability to be a 'dad'. "I'm starting to hate how tangential I am in this whole process," he tells Brenda. Her comment, "It's just sperm. It's just science, really" doesn't ease his mind. He keeps bringing it up, trying to imagine what the donor is like. She says, "To be honest, I think it's getting to be unhealthy, this obsession of yours", but he can't let it go. He becomes furious when he learns that she told her mother about the donor (it is an indication, perhaps, of how, in some ways, he is so far gone; could he have imagined that she would'nt tell her mother?).


In the case of Ellen and Joe, the intruder is manifested in the person of MacNeil, the surviving half of a couple with whom the Millers have been friends for many years. Ellen and MacNeil begin to see each other often, after the death of his wife Vera, and she half fears and half hopes that they're letting themselves drift into a romance. The introductory passage is loaded with comparisons she makes between Joe and MacNeil, and most of them are skewed on the positive side towards MacNeil. MacNeil occupies Ellen's thoughts throughout a good deal of the novel; in the end, when one of her children accidentally discovers the liaison and reveals it, all the others treat it as a "so what, they've been friends for thirty years" type of thing, completely misunderstanding. (An aside: Joe has a pet turtle, Babe, which could also be construed as an intruder of a kind.)


The intruder(s) in Jake and Liz's case are the twins babies she's carrying. Though it sounds absurd, they drive a deep wedge between the couple because being pregnant has totally turned Liz off to sex and abstinence is driving Jake mad. He resorts to keeping a secret porn collection in the basement and, at one point, she catches him about to pleasure himself with a Maxim-like magazine. In another incident, half jokingly, he gives her a "gift"—a copy of the Kama Sutra. His gauche nature is such that he can't see the dorkiness of this action:


"I'm not really feeling it, sweetie."
 
"Because you're sick? Do you feel nauseous?" he asked as innocently as he could. He couldn't help himself.
 
"I mean I'm just not feeling it on another level. I'm sorry."


Tension Due to a Lack of Sex and Romance | We've already seen how this affects Jake and Liz, and maybe it's something they'll overcome, but in the case of Brenda and Daniel, it seems to be a little more serious:


And sex was no longer the spontaneous, transporting experience it used to be. On a good day, Daniel could manage to get it up for five seconds or so—actually, on a good day, he could manage anything at all. It was obvious that Brenda missed their old talks, as well as their former sex life.


And, as regards Ellen, the idea of MacNeil is almost taking on the proportions of a swashbuckling romantic savior, as somebody to whom she could now look, in her seventies, to immerse her in the kind of ROMANTIC indulgence she feels she's never gotten from Joe. Her idealization of MacNeil goes a tad too far, especially when she contrasts him with the former men in her life:


She was not used to a man expressing such feeling, and so poetically. She was used to men keeping such things to themselves, experiencing happiness (with books, gadgets, cars, all the predictable tangibles) in the privacy of their own minds.


Hilary arrives at the house three hours early. Beholding it from the outside, one of her first thoughts is that "Jake had done well for himself. This fact still amazed her." (Jake, in fact, has more money than all of them put together, being a CFO for a successful firm. In childhood, he played a game with Ellen called 'What Would You Do If You Had A Million Dollars?') Unable to think of much else to do, she walks back to town and ends up in a place called Books & Beans, where she immediately proceeds to let herself be picked up by the counterman, Alex. The chapter ends with Alex and Hilary driving off in his car. In this section, Pitlor introduces a habit of Hilary's that occurs over and over throughout the rest of the book—she rubs her fingertips together. She worries about her "lack of a plan", yet she instantly gives confirmation that this is simply her nature by her subsequent behavior. We pointed out that the chapter ends with Alex and Hilary in the car, and I opened this article with a review of what's transpired in cars between the other six major characters. In those instances, couples who know each other very well seem to be pulling up at the crossroads while, in this case, a couple who has just met start to get to know each other and feel each other out; the discovery of truths is still quite a ways away. There's no fiddling with radio dials in this car! The journey's just beginning. As the two banter about the obvious—her pregnancy, how he likes living on a remote tourist island—it's easy to guess where they're going that afternoon, but harder to place them in the future, and, in this respect, they come to resemble everyone else in the book.


One last point about the structure of the book: Although Pitlor uses an omniscient narrator, said narrator operates from four different perspectives—those of Daniel, Ellen, Jake, and Hilary. Joe, Brenda and Liz don't release their thoughts to us except by their words and actions. In scenes that involve secondary characters—neighbors named Morris Arnold and Dorothy Wenders, a barefoot old man and a boy selling corn, a girl named Vanessa who works for a painter named Corocran—careful readers will observe the full impact of this methodology and why it works so well. I've purposely held back from saying much about these three but they were, for me, the most interesting.


The Birthdays: always elegant, sometimes wistful, occasionally opening wounds widely, now and then carrying us down memory lane, abundantly wise in its knowledge of fascicular family goings-on. These characters are people we've all known our whole lives—our parents, our siblings, our children, our friends and enemies, ourselves.

 
 
THE INTERVIEW


QUINONES: Several times, in the course of the narrative, Daniel seems to be down on himself, in terms of the kind of work he's let his career in art drift into, upset that he's not producing "real art" as opposed to the kinds of commercial projects he undertakes to make a living. In particular, Corcoran's paintings seem to trigger some resentment in him. I was wondering if you intended for this to be art-specific or if, in the larger picture, it's just one example of his overall personality?


PITLOR: The latter. Daniel feels he's lost some of his true self over the years—physically, by losing the use of his legs in a bicycling accident but, also, emotionally and creatively, and part of this came in the form of his becoming a more commercial artist a few years ago, leaving teaching and his "real art" to become a commercial illustrator. Corcoran (a fictional artist) seems to Daniel a painter of "easy art"—nothing challenging, nothing that pushes any limits. His paintings seem, to Daniel, ready-made for quick sale. Perhaps Daniel subconsciously sees his own newer work as similar to Corcoran's, which is childlike and cartoonish, echoing Daniel's own illustrations for books and restaurants and corporations. Sometimes it's easier to loathe others than it is to loathe ourselves.


QUINONES: At one point, there's an exchange between MacNeil and Ellen where, speaking of Daniel, she says "He could have been a real artist", and MacNeil says "He is a real artist." I found it ironic that MacNeil, a relative outsider, was able to make this observation while neither Ellen nor Daniel can. How might this relate, for example, to Ellen's complete inability to understand what it is, exactly, that Jake does for a living?


PITLOR: Ellen is a romantic, but she has stifled this side of herself for years and years. Her husband is a realist, and she's convinced herself that she is, too. Deep down, though, she feels as if her life has fallen short of what it could have been. She sees people in hierarchical terms, and tends to place herself on a lower rung. On the highest rung are the "greats": artists, musicians, writers, Isabella Stewart Gardener—with whom she becomes fixated. Essentially, romantics.


Her latent romanticism—which, perhaps, she keeps latent because she recognizes it as a form of elitism or snobbery—bleeds into her attitude toward her children. She understands artists to be those whose works hang in museums, those who've achieved fame or notoriety, and Daniel does not fit this description for her.


In terms of Jake, she doesn't have much interest in his job in the financial sector, mainly because she doesn't understand it. She's never been a practical person (that role has always fallen to her husband, Joe), and although she admires Jake for all the wealth he's amassed, she sees his work as earthly, unexotic, and mundane.


MacNeil, for all of his love of art and music, is much more intellectual and cerebral, and less romantic. He does not see the world so hierarchically and, so, is more able to recognize Daniel for what he is rather than what he is not.


QUINONES: Joe is really the only person in the family who seems totally comfortable with the way the course of his life has played out—serene, accepting, even stoic. You seem to imply that he's arrived at this level of wisdom through somehow acquiring deeper self-knowledge than the others, with perhaps the exception of Liz. Is that accurate?


PITLOR: Joe lives his life on a different level than many of the others. Self-knowledge and a deeper wisdom aren't as important to him. What's important are the basics—family, shelter, a sense of peace amongst those he loves. He's not a particularly reflective person, though he tends to have accurate and useful insights about others. He doesn't seek as much as the others do, so he's achieved more peace because he's had less disappointment.


Liz was raised by somewhat hedonistic, irresponsible parents and, as a reaction, has come to think of the search for deep pleasure and self-knowledge as overrated. She enjoys existing "out of her head" and in the company of others and, like Joe, enjoys the simpler things.


QUINONES: Liz connects with all her in-laws; Brenda doesn't. I thought this was because Liz is sincerely interesting in expanding the family, while Brenda simply wants to have a child of her own. I also thought Liz and Jake's relationship was much stronger than Dan and Brenda's. Is that fair to say?


PITLOR: Liz is the sort of person who gets along with everyone, but might not be particularly close to many people. She is interested in peace and simplicity, nurturing those around her (she grew up nurturing her parents) and living a more traditional life as a wife and mother and art teacher. She is not a person of desires or sensuality, so Jake's sudden need for more intimacy grates on her. Although they are profoundly different people—she is comfortable with herself while he is intensely uncomfortable in his skin—they do complement each other, and have reached a sort of balance, for the most part, that keeps them afloat.


Brenda is a more internal person, a bit more prickly, and her relationship with Daniel, her husband, is indeed quite different. She is much younger than Daniel and from a different country, and so, in certain fundamental ways, a gulf exists between them. She enjoys the thrill of meeting new people and experiencing new things, and Daniel takes this personally as a form of rejection, especially now, after his accident, when he's become so undesirable even to himself.


To me, Liz and Brenda's different connections with their in-laws reflect their very different personalities.


QUINONES: At a couple of points you really opened up some very painful 'shocks of recognition' for me, as I'm sure you do for many readers. How much of the emotional truth in the novel is a result of your direct experiences in life?


PITLOR: That's wonderful! Not the painful part, of course, but I'm glad to hear about the recognition. The events that take place in the book aren't based in fact, but maybe some of the character traits, some of the emotional moments, stem from my own character and moments I've experienced in my family. Every writer writes from their own experiences in life, whether directly or indirectly, whether they like to admit it or not.


QUINONES: I read somewhere that you stated you're interested in 'the dynamics between pregnant people'. Can you elucidate that a little for us?


PITLOR: Pregnancy is a scary, vulnerable time, and I think that pregnant women tend to either instantly connect with each other or fall into a sort of competitive relationship. Place these possible dynamics within the context of a family and I think matters can get combustible, fanned by any sibling rivalry or unresolved issues that may have built up over the years. I suppose I'm interested in how people connect with each other, and this is always more apparent within the pressure cooker of a family.


QUINONES: The 'family novel' has a long tradition in literature. Do you have any favorites in this sub-genre, or any favorites that you'd like to recommend to us as readers?


PITLOR: I'm big fan of Charles Baxter, Anne Tyler, David Huddle, William Lychack, Ellen Gilchrist, Jane Smiley, Philip Roth, Michael Cunningham, Alice Munro...I could go on and on. I'm also a fan of some "family memoirists"—Mary Karr, Frank McCourt, for example.

 

Views expressed on this page may or may not be representative of The Bohemian Aesthetic or its founder. All materials appearing on this Web site are copyrights of patsymooreDOTcom, respective authors, or original sources.